A Blow to European Populism

PNUT GALLERY
 

Sick and tired of your work lunch routine? Try cooking at your desk with a makeshift soda can stove and some other office odds and ends. A meal of hand-rolled noodles, broth, and freshly roasted chicken and veggies awaits you. Really!

 
 
 
IN A NUTSHELL: MUST READ
 

Dutch Voters Choose Proven Leadership Over Populism: The highly anticipated first election of Europe’s busy election year has come to an end. As with Brexit and the election of Donald Trump, the polls had it wrong–which, given that almost a fifth of the Dutch decide on their vote in the voting booth, isn’t surprising. The “Tweede Kamerverkiezingen” (Dutch for parliamentary elections) turned into a successful evening for the nation’s established parties. 81 percent of eligible voters turned out, the highest number in three decades.

The Winner: The right-liberal People’s Party for Freedom and Democracy (VVD) of Prime Minister Mark Rutte, buoyed by his recent handling of the diplomatic row between the Netherlands and Turkey, secured 33 seats (with 94 percent of votes counted) in the 150-seat parliament. The VVD however won eight fewer seats than in the 2012 vote, when it claimed 41. Still, the VVD is by far the largest party in the country, all but assuring Rutte’s return as Prime Minister.

The Loser: The biggest loser of the night–by a margin larger than the Greek government’s debt–was the Dutch Labour party (PvdA) of Lodewijk Asscher, which was virtually annihilated and lost some 29 seats, compared to the 2012 election.

The Hair Spray Model: All eyes were on the the man blowing up European politics, populist firebrand Geert Wilders, whose anti-immigrant and anti-EU Freedom Party (PVV) secured 20 seats. Even with a second place finish, Wilders has no path to power, as he is about as popular among fellow party leaders (especially Rutte) as cholera, Ebola and AIDS combined.

The Others: The new Dutch parliament doesn’t mirror the trend of soaring hard-right populism seen in the United States and other parts of Europe. In a third-place tie behind the VVD and PVV are the center-right Christian Democratic Appeal (CDA) and the left-liberal D66 party, both with 19 seats. The Green-Left (GL) party, led by 30-year-old Jesse Klaver, made significant gains and captured 14 seats.

What Now for the Netherlands?: With thirteen parties projected to move into Parliament, creating a viable coalition will be anything but easy. European parliamentary elections are often followed by weeks, if not months, of negotiations between parties in order to form a coalition. Many see the strong possibility of the formation of a center-right coalition between four parties: the VVD, CDA, D66, and CU (Christian Union).

What Does This Mean for the Rest of Europe?: The election represents a victory for moderates, while putting a momentary damper on populist plans to sweep Europe’s heartland through elections in the Netherlands, France, and Germany. The Dutch results heavily benefit French presidential candidate Emmanuel Macron, who represents similar policies as Mark Rutte and could also be compared to Green-Left popstar Jesse Klaver, who has drawn comparisons to Justin Trudeau and Barack Obama.

The Dutch vote could indicate burgeoning disenchantment of the political far-right on both sides of the Atlantic. In his victory speech Wednesday night, Rutte told his cheering supporters: “This night is a night for the Netherlands–after Brexit, after the American elections–where we said stop it, stop it to the wrong kind of populism.” But his statement, ironically, is a populist battle cry in and of itself. But would we expect anything less than the bold and dramatic in our politics nowadays?

 

 
 
 
NUTS AND BOLTS: SHOULD READ
 

Trump Travel Ban V2.0 Has Some Bugs: On Wednesday, hours before Trump’s new travel ban was to take effect, Federal Judge Derrick Watson from Hawaii issued a 43-page ruling blocking the second iteration of President Trump’s executive order. The decision prevents the travel ban from going into effect, at least for now. Hawaii argued that the ban would prevent its residents from receiving visits from relatives in the six countries named the order and that the ban would harm its tourism industry and its ability to recruit foreign students and workers.

Hawaii’s ruling came as the ban’s opponents in three other states asked judges to block the executive order. In Maryland, attorneys told a federal judge that the measure still discriminates against Muslims. Government attorneys countered that the ban was revised substantially to address such concerns, including the removal of an exemption for religious minorities from the six countries. The Maryland lawsuit also argued that it is against federal law to reduce the number of refugees allowed into the United States this year from 110,000 to 50,000. Attorneys argued that if that portion of the ban is implemented, 60,000 individuals would be stranded in war-torn countries with nowhere else to go.

 
 
 
LOOSE NUTS
 

More Reads:

Please support Daily Pnut!

Yes, I want to sound marginally more intelligent: